Legal Opinion
State v. Baca
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1970No. 410PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of the illegal sale of morphine. Section 54—7-14, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2). He raises four points for reversal. We affirm.
1. “THE COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE ACTION ON THE GROUND THAT THE WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON AN INVALID COMPLAINT AND, THEREFORE[,] TPIE COURT DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO TRY THE DEFENDANT ON THE SUBJECT CHARGES.”
On oral argument, defendant conceded that State v. Halsell, 81 N.M. 239, 465 P.2d 518 (Ct.App.1970), decided after the submission of briefs here, is dispositive. We agree.
2. “THE COURT…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. McFerranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Beall v. ReidyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. SimonsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. ShadeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Atol v. SchifaniNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.