Legal Opinion

United States v. Daryl Kollman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2014No. 10-36059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Daryl J. Kollman appeals the district court’s judgment in an action by the United States to reduce to judgment income tax assessments for the 1996 calendar year and to foreclose on certain properties. The district court determined, among other things, that the government’s collection suit was not barred by the ten-year statute of limitations. See 26 U.S.C. § 6502(a)(1). 1 The court did so on the basis that the running of the statute of limitations had been tolled. See § 6330(e)(1). Kollman asserts that the district court erred. We disagree and affirm.

BACKGROUND

On November 24, 1997, the…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Northcross v. Memphis Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kloosterboer International Forwarding LLC v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  2. United States v. BuckardtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  3. United States v. HoweDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
  4. United States v. HoweDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
  5. United States v. HoweDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API