Ex Parte Pena

OPINION

The opinion of the Court was delivered

In his application for a writ of habeas corpus, Mr. Pena requests relief from his conviction for deadly conduct because the jury did not impose a fine as a part of his punishment, but the written judgment includes a $10,000 fíne as well as the jury-assessed ten year probated prison sentence. Applicant argues that he is entitled to habeas corpus relief because the fine was “unauthorized by law” and thus his sentence is void.1 We disagree. Applicant’s judgment could have been inaccurate in that it was inconsistent with the jury’s verdict, but it is…