State v. King

ARNOLD, Judge.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the court erred in allowing into evidence the objects seized in the search of defendant’s residence. Defendant argues that they were inadmissible because the application underlying the search warrant was insufficient, both for failure to provide information to establish the reliability and credibility of the informants and for the staleness of the information it contained.

Deputy Sheriff Rickman’s application of 24 August 1978 for a warrant to search defendant’s residence contained the following allegations to establish probable cause: (1)…