Legal Opinion
Goudy v. Cummings
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 1, 2019No. 17-3665PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, Chief Judge.
In 1963 the Supreme Court announced that the prosecution team has a duty under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to turn over material, exculpatory evidence to criminal defendants. Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) ; see also Kyles v. Whitley , 514 U.S. 419, 115 S.Ct. 1555, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995) ;
*836United States v. Bagley , 473 U.S. 667, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985). Walter Goudy contends in this case that the state and local officials who pursued him for a 1993 murder failed to comply with their Brady obligations,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Christopher Coleman v. City of Peoria, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Tyjuan Anderson v. City of Rockford, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- David Camm v. Stanley FaithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Nakiya Moran v. Calumet City, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Jeremiah EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.