Cobbins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.
The offense is rape; the punishment, life.
Three grounds of error are set forth in appellant’s brief. Ground 1 complains that the charge to the jury at the hearing on punishment is fundamentally defective in that it authorizes the jury to find that appellant had been previously convicted of a felony.
The state did not seek the death penalty. Appellant filed application for probation and elected to have the jury assess the punishment.
The charge attacked is that portion which referred to the application for probation and instructed the jury as to the necessity of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- David v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Glenn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Piper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.