Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Central Business Men's Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action upon an accident insurance policy. The cause was tried to a jury. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of the policy and interest, and judgment was given accordingly. The defendant appeals.

The policy sued on insures Dr. Samuel E. Shoemaker "against loss resulting from bodily injuries effected directly or independently of all other causes, through accidental means (suicide, sane or insane, is not covered), as specified in the following schedule: . . . For loss of life, $5,000." The plaintiff is the beneficiary named in the policy. The insured died on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grand Lodge Independent Order of Mutual Aid v. WietingIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Knights Templars & Masons Life Indemnity Co. v. CraytonIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Royal Circle v. AchterrathIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Zerulla v. Supreme Lodge Order of Mutual ProtectionIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Seitzinger v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API