Legal Opinion

Brockhausen v. Bowes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit for money had and received. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

The parties on both sides of this case are real estate brokers, and. in their dealings with each other acted in behalf of undisclosed principals. The appellees contracted by parol to buy of the appellants some lots numbered 8, 9 and 10, and forgetting what they had bought and rejecting all overtures •from the appellants to carry out the contract they made, sued for a deposit of $100 they had made with the appellants. The appellees insisted upon lots numbered 6 and 7 instead of 9 and 10. Ho demand for the return of the money was made before suit. Whether any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. WellesIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Dulin v. PrinceIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schechinger v. GaultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Ryan v. ShoenbergerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  3. Gerill Corp. v. SutteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API