Legal Opinion

State v. Eggl

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ChRistiaNsoN, Ch. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of engaging in the liquor traffic, and appeals from the judgment of conviction, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The crime of engaging in.the liquor traffic is defined thus: “Any person who shall within this state, manufacture, sell, barter, transport, import, export, deliver, furnish of possess any intoxicating liquor, shall be guilty of the crime of engaging in the liquor traffic.” Laws 1923, chap. 268, § IB.

The information in this case charges that the defendant committed the crime of engaging in the liquor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. MozinskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rohlik v. Farmers InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. State v. MoetonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. BellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API