Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1937No. File No. Cr. 139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The defendant was informed against 022 a charge of forgery. She entered a plea of 22ot guilty; was tried by a jury which returned a verdict of guilty; her motion for a new trial was denied; and judgme2rt of coi2victioi2 was entered 022 the verdict.

The facts show22 as the state’s case may be stated briefly as follows: The Powers Elevator Compa22y is a corporation engaged in the business of buying and sellÍ22g graii2. In 1935 it had an elevator at Chama, a siding near Sentinel Butte, North Dakota. Angus Bell was the agent for the purpose of buying grain brought to such elevator. As agent he had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Meyer v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hampton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. State v. RobySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Thelma L. Selvidge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API