Legal Opinion
State of Oregon v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1954No. 13345_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon non-governmental public utility corporation, applied for and has been granted a license1 by the Fed*349eral Power Commission to construct, operate and maintain a hydro-electric plant known as the Pelton Project, numbered 2030, on the Deschutes River2 in Oregon. The Project is to be located downstream from where Crooked River and Metolius River, two principal tributaries to the Deschutes, flow into the latter. The Project is designed to consist of a concrete dam approximately two hundred five feet high in connection with a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colville Confederated Tribes v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Power Commission v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Rocky Mountain Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Colville Confederated Tribes v. Boyd Walton, Jr., Et Ux, and State of Washington, Intervening United States of America v. William Boyd Walton Et Ux, and State of Washington, United States of America v. William Boyd Walton, Jr., Et Ux, and State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Power Commission v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.