Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of imprisonment upon conviction of violating ORS 164.240 (burglary not in a dwelling).

There are nine assignments of error. It is not necessary, however, to discuss each of them in detail, as it is clear that the case must be remanded for another trial because a purported confession was received in evidence without an evidentiary record to support its admissibility.

During the trial, the defendant made timely objection to the introduction in evidence of a confession which he contended was the product of coercion.

The defendant testified, and the state did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. NunnOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jack R. Allen v. Hoyt C. Cupp, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ErvinOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Nunn v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. SunderlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API