Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1986No. Misc. 86-027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

This case presents what is apparently a question of first impression regarding the power of a federal grand jury to subpoena information from a duly constituted select committee of the state legislature. We are here called upon to decide whether members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives who are not themselves the target of a federal criminal investigation may assert a privilege of non-disclosure, based on constitutional Speech or Debate considerations, against a federal grand jury subpoena.

The following facts are undisputed. 1 The House of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Eastland v. United States Servicemen's FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'HARA v. KovensCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated November 14, 1989District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. United States v. Gonzalez De ModestiDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API