Legal Opinion
North Bridge Associates, Inc. v. Boldt
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 19, 2001No. 01-1622PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellants claim that they twice were victims of real estate frauds perpetrated by appellee Benjamin Boldt and others. 1 They brought suit alleging a variety of state law claims and a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). The district court concluded, inter alia, that appellants could not show the pattern of racketeering activity required to support RICO liability and therefore dismissed the complaint. 2 Appellants argue that their factual allegations were sufficient to support recovery and that, in any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ahmed v. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- New England Data Services, Inc. v. Barry BecherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Richard Beck v. Robert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Karvelas v. Melrose-Wakefield HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Picciotto v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Sanchez v. Triple-S Management, Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- In Re Lupron® Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.