Legal Opinion
State v. Schultz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 28, 1998No. 97-3414PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoover, J.
Joseph Schultz appeals a judgment declaring his bar a nuisance. He argues that §§ 823.09 and 823.10, STATS., unconstitutionally violate his federal due process and freedom of association rights, contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. He further contends that § 944.30(5), Stats., 1 which criminalizes sexual contact, unconstitutionally establishes religion and violates equal protection, contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments. We conclude that the statutes are constitutional and therefore affirm.
Schultz owns the Island Bar. Two men, Thomas…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Milwaukee County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Eugene W.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Schultz, Joseph v. City of CumberlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Joseph Schultz, Doing Business as Island Bar, and Tonya Norwood, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Cumberland, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999