Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wightman v. American National Bank of Riverton

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1980No. 4949Published

1DissentRaper, Chief Justice

I dissent. My views remain those which I enunciated on March 13, 1979 in Wightman v. American National Bank of Riverton, Wyo.1979, 591 P.2d 903.1

A majority of this court now determines that without any doubt this case was one to be governed in its entirety by Art. 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and, further, that Art. 9 is unambiguously clear in its governance of the facts and circumstances of this case. This is so even though the parties never structured the underlying events to be within the contemplation of Art. 9. Not one single step in the events which transpired between the appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial Banking Co. v. SpurlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Ogilvie v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Howick v. Bank of Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wightman v. American National Bank of RivertonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API