Legal Opinion

Howick v. Bank of Salt Lake

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1972No. 12742PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The defendant, hereafter called the bank, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Howick.

*66'""Hówifck’s ’¿ofporate client' had a certificate' of deposit in the amount of -$5,000 with the banlo which it had pledged for a loan. The corporate client obtained temporary possession of the certificate by telling the-bank it needed the certificate to show its auditor in. order to make up a prospectus for-stock sale purposes. Instead-of returning the certificate to the bank as promised, the corporate client assigned it to Howick in payment of attorney’s fees which it owed to him. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox v. Allstate Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wightman v. American National Bank of RivertonWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. GNS PARTNERSHIP v. FullmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Ogilvie v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Southview Corp. v. Kleberg First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API