Legal Opinion

R v. M

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1964No. 8271, 8273PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

383 S.W.2d 894 (1964)

R____, Plaintiff, Appellant-Respondent,

v.

M____, Defendant, Appellant-Respondent.

Nos. 8271, 8273.

Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri.

November 13, 1964.

Veryl L. Riddle, Riddle, O'Herin & Newberry, Malden, for plaintiff, appellant-respondent.

Charles M. Cable, John W. Noble, Bradley & Noble, Kennett, for defendant, appellant-respondent.

HOGAN, Judge.

This is a divorce action. The husband is the plaintiff; the wife is the defendant. The plaintiff filed suit for divorce, stating as his grounds that the defendant had committed adultery and had offered him certain intolerable…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Franklin v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Simon v. SimonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Hamilton v. LinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Conant v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McGuire v. BodeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gregg v. GreggMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Schwarz v. SchwarzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Ritter v. RitterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API