Legal Opinion
F. H. Harries and Aileen Harries, His Wife v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1965No. 19345_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
In this action against the United States, F. H. Harries and his wife seek damages for loss sustained when Harries contracted encephalitis following a border smallpox vaccination administered by employees of the United States. 1 Plaintiffs predicated liability on the asserted failure of border officials to advise Harries that the vaccination might cause him to contract encephalitis and that, instead of submitting to vaccination, he could have insisted upon the alternatives of isolation or surveillance. 2 Plaintiffs also alleged in their complaint that the United States…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- David D. Beck, A/K/A Dave Beck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.