Legal Opinion

United States v. Ferby

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 19, 2004No. Nos. 02-1506, 02-1535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*287SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Defendants-appellants John A. Ferby and Darnyl Parker appeal from, inter alia, the district court’s evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, judgments of conviction, and sentencing decisions. Inasmuch as the parties are familiar with the facts underlying this appeal, we do not recite them here.

I. Evidentiary Rulings

The appellants argue that the district court erred by admitting under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) the statements of Thomas…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. John J. Pitchell v. James F. Callan, Gregory Sargis and City of Hartford, David J. Lesser and Steven Del Sole, Special MastersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API