Legal Opinion
Fight for the Rams v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1996No. G017874PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, J.
Within 10 days of this matter’s being assigned for all purposes to a superior court judge, defendant’s demurrer was sustained and plaintiff filed a Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 peremptory challenge. The court erroneously denied the motion as untimely. We issue a peremptory writ of mandate accordingly.
I
On February 15, 1995, Fight for the Rams, an association of football season ticket holders, sued the Los Angeles Rams Football Company, Inc. (Rams) and several other defendants for damages allegedly caused by the franchise’s then proposed and now realized move to St.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamwi v. Citinational-Buckeye Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Carabini v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bambula v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maas v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Zilog, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Charpentier v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Stubblefield Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- SCHOOL DIST. OF OKALOOSA CTY. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.