Legal Opinion

Maas v. Superior Court of San Diego County

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2016No. S225109PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

—Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 1 affords litigants the right to peremptorily challenge a superior court judge based on a good faith belief that the judge is prejudiced. When a motion under section 170.6 is in proper form and timely filed, the judge is not permitted to try the assigned civil or criminal action or special proceeding, or to hear “any matter therein that involves a contested issue of law or fact.” (§ 170.6, subd. (a)(1).) We granted review to decide whether the statute contemplates that a party may challenge the judge assigned to assess and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re SassounianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Bontilao v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. (HC) Harris v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Bauman v. Thrifty Payless CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Bontilao v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API