Legal Opinion

In re: Speer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 8, 2019No. 17-1323-bkUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17‐1323‐bk In re: Speer UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. McCall v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Edp Medical Computer Systems, Inc. v. United States of America, Docket No. 06-0106-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API