Legal Opinion
Norton v. City Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 21, 1923No. 2116PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below and will be so designated here. The individuals, who as partners traded as Norton, Lilly & Co., were citizens of states other than Virginia, of which the defendant is a corporation. They were steamship agents and brokers, having their principal office at New York but maintaining a branch office at Norfolk and at other ports. In 1921 their Norfolk office was in charge of one Odend’hal who was, at the same *841time, the representative in that city of several other concerns, among them one known as the Cory-Mann-George Corporation,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Railway Co. v. HeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Phillips v. Mercantile National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- American Sash & Door Co. v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Callaway v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of EhlertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bourne v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.