Legal Opinion

Broadwell v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1926No. 16828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. It being absolutely essential to the establishment of the defendant’s contention that he was not a tenant, but was in possession of the property as a debtor, with the right to redeem, that he establish as a fact an alleged parol agreement entered into between him and one Smith, his former creditor, on November 7, 1916, when the property was sold by the sheriff under foreclosure proceedings and bought in by Smith, by the terms of which agreement the defendant, who had been in possession of the property, was given the right to redeem the property by paying the indebtedness thereon, it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broadwell v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Healey Real Estate & Improvement Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Wilson v. Healey Real Estate & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Bahde v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API