Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Healey Real Estate & Improvement Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 13, 1947No. 16020PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson,-Justice.
(After stating the foregoing'facts.) The defendant in the trial court (now plaintiff in error) by his plea to the jurisdiction of the court attacked the portion of Code § 61-304, which provides that the issue formed in a dispossessory warrant shall be returned to “the county where the land lies,” as being violative of article '6, section 14, paragraph 6, of the Constitution of this State (Code, Ann. Supp., § 2-4906), which declares that “All other civil cases shall be tried in the county where the defendant resides.”
While this court has not passed upon the question of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wallace v. HollySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Ralls v. E. R. Taylor Auto CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Carter v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Healey Real Estate & Improvement Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Frazier v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wall v. FEDERAL LAND BANK COLUMBIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Young v. CowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. MatassinoDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Gainesville Liquidation, Inc. v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Roberts v. MacAulaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.