City of Omaha v. McGavock
Nebraska Supreme Court
• Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNon val, J.
Alexander McGavock recovered a judgment in the court below against the city of Omaha in the sum of $2,374.50, for damages alleged by him to have been sustained by the reason of the location and construction of the Tenth street viaduct in said city, upon which street plaintiff’s property abuts. To review said judgment the city has removed the cause into this court.
The assignments of error argued in the brief of the city attorney may be divided into three groups, namely, (1) those relating to the rulings of the court upon the admission of testimony; (2) alleged errors in the giving and refusing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- First National Bank v. Lowrey Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Brooks v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Darner v. DaggettNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Scofield v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hovey v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- James Poultry Co. v. City of Nebraska CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Gillespie v. City of South OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Blue Valley Lumber Co. v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.