Legal Opinion

Eshelman v. Auerbach

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided May 19, 2022No. 7:16-cv-00018Unknown

1Opinion

( IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION , No. 7:16-CV-18-D □ FREDRIC N. ESHELMAN, » ) Plaintiff, v. . ‘ORDER PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. On March 15, 2019, a jury awarded plaintiff Fredric N. Eshelman (“Eshelman” or “plaintiff’) $15 85 million in compensatory damages a $6.5 million in punitive damages against defendant Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (“Puma” or “defendant”) for defamation [D.E. 388, 389]. On. June 23, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed that Puma defamed Eshelman but vacated the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Martin's Herend Imports, Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading United States of America Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API