Legal Opinion
Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1994No. 92-2447PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The decision of the BTA is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
*464I
As to the motor vehicle issue, the decision of the BTA is affirmed. The commissioner contends that the BTA erred in excepting the eleven motor vehicles from tax, while Columbia says the BTA erred in not excepting another fifty-nine vehicles.
R.C. 5739.01(E), as pertinent, provides:
“ ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
U * * *
“(2) To * * * use or consume the thing transferred * * * directly in the rendition of a public utility service * * *.”
R.C. 5739.0KP)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- SFZ Transportation, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Interest of T.J.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002