Legal Opinion

Zoss v. Protsch

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 8, 2021No. 4:20-cv-04211Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION ******************************************************************************* * FREDERICK M. ZOSS, * CIV 20-4211 * Plaintiff, * * vs. * MEMORANDUM OPINION * AND ORDER GREG PROTSCH and * MUMFORD & PROTSCH, LLP, * * Defendants. * * ****************************************************************************** Frederick Zoss has filed suit against Greg Protsch and Mumford & Protsch, LLP, alleging malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. (Doc.1). The claims arose in conjunction with Defendant Protsch's legal advice and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Lozano v. Montoya AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API