Dahlquist v. Denver & R. G. R. Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. T. B. Lewis, Judge. Action by A. Dahlquist against the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1ConcurrenceThurman, J.
If I understand the views of my Associates, we all agree that the defendant is liable for the negligence which resulted in the plaintiff’s injury. We disagree as to the ruling of the trial court sustaining plaintiff’s objections to the questions propounded to defendant’s witness Dr. Critchlow. I concur in the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice CORFMAN and Mr. Justice McCARTY that the trial court erred in sustaining the objections.
As I read the opinion of Mr. Justice McCARTY, I concur in his views both as to the conclusions reached and the reasons given therefor. I concur with Mr. Justice…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Epstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Lane v. BoicourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Marx v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
- Green v. Town of NebagamainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Treanor v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.