Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. Ademaj

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2007No. 05-0016Published

1ConcurrenceJustice O’Neill

I agree with the Court that Mid-Century and Texas Farmers Insurance Companies (collectively, “Mid-Century”) lawfully recouped the Automobile Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA) fee from their policyholders. But the Court rests that conclusion on a construction of Insurance Code article 21.35B that could permit rate-regulated insurers to collect the items enumerated therein in addition to their filed rates in a manner that threatens to undermine the Legislature’s efforts to create a fair and competitive rate system. Accordingly, I concur in the Court’s judgment, but cannot join its opinion.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API