Legal Opinion

MPW Industrial Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

MPW Industrial Services (Employer) petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed the workers’ compensation judge’s (WCJ) grant of Employer’s review petitions on the basis that the WCJ did not have subject matter jurisdiction.

Gregory Mebane (Decedent) worked for Employer as a Technician I. Employer was in the business of cleaning steel mills, power plants, and other industrial sites. Decedent’s duties included shoveling grease, water blasting, and cleaning up oil and other contaminants. Decedent would report to work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Lake v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (County of Allegheny)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Accurate Eng'g. Solutions, LLC v. J. Anderson & Williams Form Eng'g. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Pioneer Construction Co., Inc. v. Insight Pharmaceuticals, LLC d/b/a Insight PharmacyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API