Legal Opinion

Gould v. Weibel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 22, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

62 So.2d 47 (1952)

GOULD et al.

v.

WEIBEL.

SLIMER

v.

WEIBEL.

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.

December 22, 1952.

Shackleford, Farrior, Shannon & Stallings, Tampa, for appellants.

Lindsey & Cargell, St. Petersburg Beach, and Mann, Harrison & Stone, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

The sole question here is whether an insurance company must be joined as a party plaintiff in a suit by the insured against a third party tort-feasor where the insurance company has advanced to the insured, by means of a "loan receipt" transaction, an amount equal to the insured's loss and for which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Deming & Co. v. Merchants' Cotton-press, etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Shiman Bros. & Co. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Newco Land Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Indamer Corporation v. C. H. CrandonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Rosenthal v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  4. HOLYOKE MUT. INS., ETC. v. Concrete EquipmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Tanker Management Inc. v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API