Legal Opinion
Wanetick v. Mel's of Modesto, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 15, 1992No. C-92-1531 SAWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Summary of Decision
Plaintiff has sued Defendants for securities fraud in conjunction with his investment in Original Mel’s Inc., a restaurant franchisor, and Mel’s of Modesto, a partnership which franchises an Original Mel’s restaurant in Modesto, California. Defendants Gregory Dolinajec, Jeffrey Weiss, Mark Weissman, and Weiss & Weissman, Inc. move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state fraud with particularity, lack of Plaintiff standing, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendants Andrew Wilson and Michael…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Apollo Capital Fund, LLC v. Roth Capital Partners, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re Gupta Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Goodwin v. Executive Trustee Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
- Lui Ciro, Inc. v. Ciro, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.