Legal Opinion

T.B. v. O.B. (In re O.B.)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 26, 2019No. 2d Civil No. B290805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYegan, J.

*627O.B. is a person with autism spectrum disorder (autism ).1 She appeals from an order establishing a limited conservatorship of her person and appointing respondents T.B., her mother (mother), and C.B., her elder *628sister, as conservators. Appellant's principal contentions are (1) the probate court acted in excess of its jurisdiction by modifying her special education plan, and (2) the evidence is insufficient to support the probate court's findings.

A person with autism is not automatically a candidate for a limited conservatorship. Each case requires a fact-specific inquiry by the probate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. FairbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dietz v. Meisenheimer & HerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. SHEILA S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API