Legal Opinion

SHEILA S. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 2000No. H021818PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COTTLE, P. J.

This is a petition for extraordinary writ challenging the findings and orders of the juvenile court in setting a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. (§ 366.26, subd. (l); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 39.IB.) Sheila S., mother of the children at issue here (mother), argues that the juvenile court erred in granting a section 388 petition and ordering a bypass of mother’s existing reunification services. We conclude that a section 388 petition is an appropriate vehicle for modifying a dispositional order and for ordering a bypass of reunification…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Jasmon O.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crail v. BlakelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re Heidi T.California Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. T.K.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. T. J. v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Richard C. (In re Alexzander C.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Tyrone W. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Parisi v. MazzaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API