Cca Associates v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Opinion concurring in the judgments and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDyk, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority’s decision to reverse the Claims Court judgment finding a regulatory taking and with the majority’s affirmance of the Claims Court’s dismissal of the contract claim. I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s reasoning in significant respects. In particular, I disagree with the majority’s incorrect and wholly unnecessary dictum approving aspects of the Claims Court’s takings analysis. In my view, the majority’s decision refusing to consider offsetting benefits is directly contrary to our precedent, and its treatment of the character of the government…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.