Legal Opinion

Cox v. Eckstrom

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 10, 1908No. Gen. No. 4,994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Forcible entry and detainer. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. Emery C. Graves, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

We pass by-the questions whether the present appellees are partners as they describe themselves in the complaint filed before the justice; whether, if not partners, they can still maintain tMs suit; and whether the instrument called a lease in the foregoing statement is indeed a lease within the meaning of our statutes, or is merely a sale of coal. The main questions in the case are, first, have the terms of this lease been forfeited, and if so, second, could appellant lawfully re-enter as he did, or must he surrender possession to appellees because he entered unlawfully.

The proof is clear…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reeder v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Page v. PuyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Phelps v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Shoudy v. School Directors, &c.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Fabri v. BryanIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Airline Canteen Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Krasa v. United States Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API