Cox v. Eckstrom
Appellate Court of Illinois
Forcible entry and detainer. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. Emery C. Graves, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell
We pass by-the questions whether the present appellees are partners as they describe themselves in the complaint filed before the justice; whether, if not partners, they can still maintain tMs suit; and whether the instrument called a lease in the foregoing statement is indeed a lease within the meaning of our statutes, or is merely a sale of coal. The main questions in the case are, first, have the terms of this lease been forfeited, and if so, second, could appellant lawfully re-enter as he did, or must he surrender possession to appellees because he entered unlawfully.
The proof is clear…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reeder v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Page v. PuyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Phelps v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Shoudy v. School Directors, &c.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Fabri v. BryanIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Airline Canteen Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Krasa v. United States Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914