Schultz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed punishment at five days confinement and a $400 fine.
Appellant’s first point of error contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the information, because Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6701Z-1 sec. (a)(2)(B) (Vernon Supp.1987), is unconstitutionally vague. Article 6701Z-l(a)(2)(B) provides that:
“Intoxicated” means: having an alcohol concentration of 0.10 percent or more. Article 6701Z-l(a)(l) defines alcohol concentration as:
(A) the number of grams of alcohol per…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Goocher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. Muller, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.