Legal Opinion

Schultz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 29, 1987No. 01-86-0434-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed punishment at five days confinement and a $400 fine.

Appellant’s first point of error contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the information, because Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6701Z-1 sec. (a)(2)(B) (Vernon Supp.1987), is unconstitutionally vague. Article 6701Z-l(a)(2)(B) provides that:

“Intoxicated” means: having an alcohol concentration of 0.10 percent or more. Article 6701Z-l(a)(l) defines alcohol concentration as:

(A) the number of grams of alcohol per…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Goocher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. State v. Muller, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Schultz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Schultz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API