Schultz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MILLER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by the jury of driving while intoxicated. Punishment was assessed by the court at five days in county jail.
On direct appeal, the First Court of Appeals in Houston affirmed appellant’s conviction holding, in a published opinion, Schultz v. State, 725 S.W.2d 411 (Tex.App.1987), that appellant was not entitled to an attorney under Article I, Section 10 of the Texas Constitution during the breathalyzer test. Thereafter, this Court granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review in order to review…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Schultz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990