Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Russell v. Board of Appeals

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1947PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Curtis did not comply with art. IX of the zoning ordinance in entering his appeal, for he did not file the notice required, specifying the grounds for appeal. The ordinance requires a notice in the nature of a pleading setting forth a cause. The notices Curtis filed merely requested consideration by the board of the application which had been denied by the building inspector. Neither notice specified the grounds for appeal. Art. IX of ordinance 12.17 makes the allegation of the grounds for appeal a vital part of the appeal, and since that requirement of the ordinance was not met, the matter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colteryahn Sanitary Dairy v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Yanta v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bachand v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Ross v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cudahy v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bourque v. Wausau Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API