Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. McDougal

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 28, 1994No. Misc. A. No. 94-0272 (HHG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

This case comes before this Court on petition of the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”) to enforce subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum issued to respondents Jim Guy Tucker (“Tucker”) and James McDougal (“McDougal”). The subpoenas were issued to respondents on June 1, 1994 and to date neither respondent has complied with either subpoena. On September 1, 1994, this Court ordered both respondents to appear in this Court on October 18, 1994 to show cause why the subpoenas should not be enforced.

I

Respondent McDougal did not respond in any way to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Ralph L. Browning, Executive Vice President of Lehigh Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of the Treasury v. Walter DobbsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Federal Housing Finance Agency v. First Horizon Home Loan CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. AbramsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. LechaseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  4. Pinkston v. CB Operations, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API