Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2017No. 17-0039PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice:

This case is before us on two certified questions from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. We consider whether two recently enacted statutes relating to damages—West Virginia Code §§ 55-7-29 and 55-7E-3—apply in a trial conducted after the effective date of the statutes when the underlying facts in the case occurred prior to that effective date. Finding the two statutes at issue to be remedial, we answer the certified questions in the affirmative.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Petitioner Helio Martinez was employed by Respondent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Public Citizen, Inc. v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Linda Jasperson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Purolator Courier Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Daniel W. Miller and The City of Parkersburg v. Kevin AllmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Larry v. Marion Cnty. Coal Co.United States District Court · 2018
  3. W.Va. Department of Transportation, Div. of Highways v. Douglas R. VeachWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Christopher J. v. Donnie Ames, SuperintendentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Goldstein v. Peacemaker Props., LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API