State v. Raugust

¶1 Richard Raugust appeals from the convictions and sentencing contained in the judgment entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County. We affirm.

¶2 Raugust presents the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it instructed the jury that it could not consider intoxication in determining the existence of a mental state, which is an element of the offense?

¶4 2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it denied Raugust the opportunity to present contemporary statements made by him prior to, and at the time of, his…