Legal Opinion
Pirozak v. Knight
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 18, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00499Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VENDELA PIROZAK, Case No. 2:19-cv-499 Plaintiff, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers v. MORGAN KNIGHT, et ai., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Assistant Prosecutor Jack Felgenhauer’s (“Felgenhauer”) Motion to Dismiss and Defendant Deputy Morgan Knight’s (“Knight”) Motion to Partially Dismiss. (ECF No.7.) Plaintiff Vendela Pirozak (‘Plaintiff’) responded and Felgenhauer and Knight replied. (ECF Nos. 10, 11.) For the reasons stated herein,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.