Costello v. Nixdorff
Missouri Court of Appeals
Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Boyle, J. Actual notice of the dissolution was necessary to relieve the retiring partner from liability. — Garter v. Whalley, 1 Barn. & Adol. 11; Williams v. Keats, 2 Stark.
Read the full summary
Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Boyle, J. Actual notice of the dissolution was necessary to relieve the retiring partner from liability. — Garter v. Whalley, 1 Barn. & Adol. 11; Williams v. Keats, 2 Stark. N. P. 290 ; Dolman v. Orchard, 2 Car. & P. 104 ; Parkin v. Garruthers, 3 Esp. 248 ; Pilis v. Bronson, 40 111. 455; Amidown v. Osgood, 24 Vt. 278; Gaar v. Huggins, 12 Bush, 259; Southern v..Grim, 67 111. 106; Speer v. Bishop, 24 Ohio St. 598 ; 'Donzelot v.- Rawlings, 58 Mo. 76. ■ ■ The appellant was not of that class of persons entitled to notice of the- dissolution.— Whitman v.…
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
In the year 1873, the.plaintiff was in the employ of Gr. Meysenburg & Go., a- partnership firm,, engaged in the wholesale liquor-trade, and while the plaintiff was so employed, the defendant Nixdorff became a member of the firm. Some time • after this event the plaintiff gave up his situation, and went on a visit to Ireland. On April 1, 1875, the firm was dissolved by the retirement of Nixdorff, and a new firm was established, bearing the same name, and composed of Meysenburg and the defendant White. Nixdorff remained in the house as a salaried book-keeper until December, 1875. In'May, 1875,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clapp v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1855