Clapp v. . Rogers

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The only question in this case arises upon the exception to the charge of the judge to the jury. He instructed them "that if the plaintiffs sold goods to Rogers Co. before the dissolution, and delivered the goods to them to be paid for afterwards, though no term of credit was fixed, and the defendants did not in fact pay for them in some months afterwards, such a transaction made the plaintiffs dealers with Rogers Co., so as to entitle them to notice of the…