Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 11, 2021No. 1:18-cv-01066Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION PRENTICE ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. No. 1:18-cv-1066-JDB-jay Re: 1:15-cr-10067-JDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING § 2255 AMENDED PETITION, DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, AND DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner, Prentice Robinson,1 has filed a pro se amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (the “Amended Petition) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 4.)2 For the following reasons, the Amended Petition is DENIED. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API