Legal Opinion

Hamil v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1989No. WD 40905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Judge.

Richard Hamil appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 27.26 1 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Hamil was found guilty of second degree murder (§ 565.004, RSMo 1978) 2 and sentenced to fifty years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. See State v. Hamil, 687 S.W.2d 605 (Mo. App.1985). Mr. Hamil contends the court erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief, averring that the trial court’s sentence of fifty years imprisonment ex ceeded the maximum allowed by statute and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Berbiglia, Inc. v. RandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Pool v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wiles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. FreemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. QuallsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Onken v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. HooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API